Showing posts with label Canadian Mortgages. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canadian Mortgages. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Get Pre-Approval to Lock in, or Wait? Read this guys story on Interest Rate

Meet the interest rate that really affects your life


Alex Thomas couldn’t have chosen a better time to lock into a five-year, fixed-rate mortgage. The Toronto-based public relations professional locked in a 3.39-per-cent rate for 120 days at the beginning of July. He bought a house in October, but if he had waited any longer, his monthly payments would likely have gone up.

Why? Because Canada’s long-term interest rates have been steadily climbing since June. When Mr. Thomas locked in, the 10-year Government of Canada Benchmark Bond – the rate that’s most closely tied to mortgage rates – was about 2.4 per cent. It has steadily been rising since then, hovering around 2.6 per cent.
“I’m glad we got preapproved,” he says. “By the time we got our mortgage, the rate had already gone up twice.”
When it comes to interest rates, most of the attention is on the Bank of Canada’s overnight rate, which governs short-term lending. But it’s long-term fixed income rates that have the most affect on people’s wealth. Rising five-year, 10-year and 30-year yields impact everything from mortgage rates to portfolio returns.
Unlike the overnight rate, which the Bank of Canada is responsible for moving, the long-term rates shift based on what’s happening around the world.
For most of last year and until late May, the 10-year Government of Canada bond rate was in the 1.6 per cent to 2 per cent range. Then, U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke said that he might slow down the U.S. government’s quantitative easing program – it’s been buying $85-billion (U.S.) worth of its own bonds since last fall.
That announcement caused long-term bond rates to rise around the world.
“The Bank of Canada had nothing to do with that,” says Darcy Briggs, a portfolio manager with Franklin Templeton Investments. “These rates are greatly affected by events occurring outside of the bank’s control.”
For house hunters like Mr. Thomas, the most obvious impact of rising rates is higher fixed-mortgage costs, says Mr. Briggs. According to Ratehub.ca, in May Canadians could get a five-year fixed rate for 2.64 per cent. That rate is now closer to 3.4 per cent.
Variable mortgage rates are based on the overnight rate, explains Mr. Briggs, so those costs haven’t increased this year.
Rising rates have also had an impact on certain investments, but especially on bond values, says Allan Small, a senior investment adviser at HollisWealth. When yields rise, bond prices fall, he explains.
“If a bond issue today is paying 6 per cent and an old bond is paying 5 per cent, then who would want the bond that’s paying less?” he asks. “That lower-paying bond then gets sold at a discounted price.”
In June of 2012, the Government of Canada issued a 10-year bond for about $100. Because rates have risen, that bond is now worth about $90.
“People in retirement have flocked to bonds because they’re low-risk investments,” Mr. Small says. “But over the last couple of months, they see their portfolio down, even though the stock market is going up, and they’re wondering what’s going on.”
However, it’s not just falling bond prices that have affected wealth. Certain equities are affected by higher rates, too. Investors who hold real estate investment trusts and utilities will have noticed that returns have fallen.
These two sectors typically offer higher-than-average yields, which is attractive in a low interest-rate environment. When bond rates rise, though, the risk and return properties of these stocks become less attractive. It starts making more sense to own a more stable fixed-income instrument than an equity investment, Mr. Briggs says.
“At 1 per cent, that bond doesn’t look as attractive, but it gets better at 2 per cent,” he explains. “That makes the outlook for other investments not as bright.”
This doesn’t matter as much to investors who are solely in the market for income, says Mr. Small. Hold a bond to maturity and you’ll still get the same return as you would have when you originally purchased it.
If you want to sell a stock or bond, or want to see your portfolio rise, then you may be out of luck.
“If you’re concerned about the value of your portfolio, then you have to be mindful of the risk.”
To minimize the impact of rising rates, Mr. Small avoids bond funds, which don’t have a maturity date and often fall when rates rise. He buys the actual bond for clients because he’s able to hold the security to maturity and receive the full payout he was entitled to when he purchased the bond.
“I know at some point in the future, it will reach its maturity date, so I don’t care about the price,” he says.
Some investors may also want to pare back their exposure to real estate investment trusts, utilities and other interest-rate-sensitive stocks, Mr. Small says. If rates continue to rise, then these stocks could be hit again.
Instead, consider owning some bank stocks. Financial institutions also pay attractive yields, but they benefit from rising rates – higher rates allow them to make more off the dollars held in savings accounts.
For Mr. Thomas, the only affect rising rates would have had on him would have been on his mortgage. He doesn’t yet invest, but he’s planning to start. When he does, he says he will keep his eye on where rates are headed.
“I’m reading about what’s going on with rates,” he says. “That could impact where I put my money.”

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

News Article: CMHC moves to take steam out of housing market

Ottawa is taking new steps to cool the country’s housing market.
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. is limiting guarantees it offers banks and other lenders on mortgage-backed securities. The measure comes amid the federal government’s efforts to protect taxpayers from financial risks in the housing sector, further cool lending and add upward pressure to mortgage rates.
The Crown corporation has notified banks, credit unions and other mortgage lenders that they will each be restricted to a maximum of $350-million of new guarantees this month under its National Housing Act Mortgage-Backed Securities (NHA MBS) program. The decision comes in the wake of “unexpected demand” for the guarantees, a spokeswoman for CMHC said in an e-mailed statement.
The conversion of loans into securities with CMHC backing has become a popular way for lenders to tap funds from a broad range of investors, enabling banks to issue more mortgages and at a lower cost.
Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, concerned that Canada’s housing market might overheat and infect the economy, has been taking steps to cut back the flow of mortgage credit. This spring, he went as far as to publicly chastise some banks for dropping their mortgage rates too low.
He is also taking steps to reduce the degree to which taxpayers backstop the housing market.
This year, he announced he would restrict the ability of banks to buy bulk insurance from CMHC, and he curtailed the use of government-backed insurance in securities sold by the private sector. Ottawa released a legal framework for covered bonds, another type of bond backed by pools of mortgages, last year. It said banks could not use insured mortgages in such securities.
In addition to removing fuel from the housing market, these moves force banks and other lenders to take on more of the risk of mortgage defaults, rather than offloading that risk to Ottawa.
Canada’s housing market slowed in the wake of the government’s moves, namely Mr. Flaherty’s decision last summer to tighten mortgage insurance rules. Still, prices in most areas continued to climb, and sales have begun to bounce back.
“The government is attempting to tighten credit conditions for home loans, for example the changes to CMHC’s underwriting standards last year, and this is the latest iteration of that effort,” said National Bank analyst Peter Routledge.
He said that the four largest mortgage underwriters, Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto-Dominion Bank, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Bank of Nova Scotia, had made good use of the NHA MBS program “and I expect that their funding strategies will change as a consequence.”
“Given the differentials in funding costs via NHA MBS or unsecured long-term funding, I could see [an additional] 20 to 65 basis points in the cost of funding mortgages for the larger banks,” he said. “All else equal, we could see mortgage rates start to move up in unison.”
At the start of this year, after consultations with CMHC, Mr. Flaherty said the Crown corporation could guarantee a maximum of $85-billion worth of new NHA MBS this year. By the end of July, lenders had already issued $66-billion worth of the securities, compared to $76-billion during all of 2012. As a result, CMHC is imposing the $350-million cap on each issuer effective immediately, while it comes up with a formal allocation process this month that it will put in place for the final four months of the year.
The Crown corporation guarantees timely payment of interest and principal to investors in both types of securities, and charges the banks a fee for the service.
On its website, CMHC states that “MBS [have] helped to ensure a ready supply of low-cost funds for housing finance and to keep mortgage lending costs as low as possible for homeowners.”
Mr. Routledge said that smaller mortgage lenders don’t create enough NHA MBS to be materially affected by the new $350-million cap.
The amount of NHA MBS being issued shot up during the financial crisis, as banks sought cheaper sources of funds to continue lending mortgages. The securities are backed by pools of insured mortgages, and investors receive monthly principal and interest payments that stem from the payments homeowners make on the underlying mortgages. Banks sell the securities to investors, or to be used in the Canada Mortgage Bond program.

Source: TARA PERKINS The Globe and Mail